Editorial 1: Regulating India’s virtual digital assets revolution
Context
There is a big difference between what is real and what policies say, causing problems for regulators and market participants.
Introduction
India remains the top country for grassroots crypto adoption for the second year in a row, according to the ‘Geography of Crypto’ report by Chainalysis (2024). A report by the National Association of Software and Service Companies (NASSCOM) shows that Indian retail investors invested $6.6 billion in crypto assets and expects the industry to create over eight lakh jobs by 2030. India also has one of the largest and fastest-growing groups of web3 developers.
Crypto’s Vibrancy Amid Regulatory Challenges in India
India’s Challenges with Decentralised Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs)
Key Issues with Regulatory Framework
|
Aspect |
Details |
|
Capital Controls & Payments |
India has strict capital controls and tight payment regulations that conflict with the decentralised nature of VDAs. |
|
RBI’s Early Concerns (2013) |
RBI warned about risks due to VDAs lacking central bank authorisation. |
|
RBI Circular (2018) |
RBI barred financial institutions from VDA dealings, but the Supreme Court overturnedthis in 2020. |
Government’s Tax Measures on VDAs (2022)
|
Tax Policy |
Purpose |
Effectiveness |
|
1% TDS on VDA transactions > ₹10,000(Section 194S) |
Increase transparency and track transactions |
Limited impact due to offshore trading |
|
30% Capital Gains Tax (Section 115BBH) |
Tax profits from VDA trading without loss offset |
Did not stop tax evasion and speculation |
Impact of Offshore Trading & Regulatory Evasion
Attempts to Block Non-Compliant Platforms
|
Method |
Outcome |
|
URL Blocking |
Temporary trade volume drop, but quick rebound |
|
VPN & Mirror Sites |
Users bypassed blocks, traffic increased by 57% |
|
Migration to other exchanges |
Continued trading on non-compliant platforms |
Global Guidelines vs. India’s Current VDA Policy
Global Standards on VDA Regulation
|
Body |
Key Focus |
|
International Monetary Fund (IMF) |
Supports comprehensive, risk-based regulation aligned internationally. |
|
Financial Stability Board (FSB) |
Promotes harmonised rules for financial stability. |
|
Financial Action Task Force (FATF) |
Focuses on anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terror financing (CTF)controls. |
India’s Policy Challenges
Indian VASPs: Growing Stronger and More Responsible
|
Development |
Impact |
|
Closer collaboration with Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU-India) |
Improved AML and CTF controls, praised by FATF. |
|
Response to 2024 $230 million hack |
Exchanges improved cybersecurity, created insurance funds, and developed industry-wide security guidelines. |
|
Maturity & Compliance |
Indian VASPs show willingness to follow regulations and act in good faith. |
Conclusion
India’s booming crypto market highlights the urgent need for clear, balanced regulation. While grassroots adoption and VASPs drive growth and innovation, current policies push users offshore, risking tax loss and weak oversight. To protect investors and the economy, India must enact pragmatic, future-ready laws that support industry growth while managing risks effectively.