Editorial 2: ​Marked for life

Context

Courts and law enforcement must deliver stronger justice for acid attack survivors.

Introduction

The Supreme Court of India expressed deep shock over a case where an acid attack survivor has awaited justice for 16 years, calling the delay a mockery of the system. The Court stressed that acid attackers deserve no sympathy and urged systemic reform, quicker trials, and stronger legal protections to ensure dignity, justice, and rehabilitation for survivors.

Key Issue — Slow Pace of Justice

• The Supreme Court criticised the 16-year delay, calling it a “mockery of the system”.
• CJI Surya Kant insisted that acid attackers should not receive any sympathy from courts.
• Urged the entire judicial system to respond firmly to such crimes.

Case Background — Shaheen Malik’s Struggle

• Attacked in 2009 at age 26 while pursuing an MBA.
• From 2009–2013, no progress occurred in her case.
• Trial shifted from Haryana to Rohini Court, Delhi; final arguments now pending.
• Underwent multiple reconstructive surgeries over the years.
• Founded Brave Souls (NGO) in 2021 to support survivors medically and legally.

PIL and Larger Concerns

• Malik approached the Court seeking disability recognition for acid attack survivors under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.
• Highlighted victims who were forced to ingest acid, suffering lifelong internal injuries without visible scarring.
• Sought formal acknowledgment of their suffering and need for support.

Judicial Directions & Government Stand

• CJI asked the Centre to consider an ordinance to strengthen response mechanisms.
• Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta supported the petition, stating perpetrators should face equal ruthlessness.
• Court directed Registrar-Generals of all High Courts to furnish data on pending acid attack trials.
• Proposed special courts for day-to-day hearings to prevent delays.

Legal & Policy Context

• In Laxmi vs Union of India, the Court had earlier ordered strict treatment, rehabilitation, and regulated sale of acid.
• Section 124 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita specifies punishment for acid attacks.
• Despite laws, trials remain lengthy and conviction rates low.

NCRB 2023 Data

• 207 acid attack cases recorded nationwide.
• West Bengal highest with 57 cases, followed by Uttar Pradesh with 31.
• Shows continuing prevalence of this extreme form of gender violence.

Conclusion

Acid attacks remain among the cruellest forms of gender-based violence, yet survivors still face delayed trials, inadequate support, and low conviction rates. The Supreme Court’s firm stance signals an urgent need for special courts, stronger laws, and compassionate rehabilitation. India must ensure swift justice and systemic reforms so survivors receive the dignity and protection they deserve.