Editorial 1: Justice and equality
Context
No one in urgent need of an organ transplant should be deprived of the opportunity to receive it.
Introduction
The NOTTO advisory is a progressive measure rooted in natural justice, aiming to correct a persistent gender disparity in organ transplant access. By acknowledging that women are more often donors than recipients, it challenges entrenched patriarchal norms. This step not only addresses statistical inequities but also redefines fairness in life-saving medical allocations across India’s healthcare system.
Principle and Purpose of the Decision
- Natural Justice at Core – Decisions rooted in natural justice aim to address social inequities or correct specific wrongs.
- NOTTO’s Recent Advisory – The National Organ and Tissue Transplant Organization (NOTTO) has advised giving priority to women patients and relatives of deceased donors awaiting transplants.
- Rewriting Gender Narratives – The move seeks to address gender disparities in organ transplant recipients.
Evidence of Gender Imbalance
- Decadal Data (2013–2023) – NOTTO’s records reveal a gender skew:
- Living Donor Transplants (2023) – Women formed 63% of donors, but far fewer were beneficiaries.
- Beneficiary Share (2023):
- Heart: 24% women
- Lung: 47% women
- Kidney: 37% women
- Liver: 30% women
- Pancreas: 26% women
- BMJ Analysis (Past 5 Years) – Out of 56,509 living organ donations, women contributed 36,038 donations but benefited in only 17,041 transplants.
- Aim of the Advisory – Address gender imbalance by granting extra allocation points to women patients on the waiting list.
Implementation Challenges
- Current Protocols – Organ allotment prioritises only on health grounds, with no provision for gender-based preference or benefits to relatives of donors.
- Unclear Definitions – Ambiguity over the scope of “near relatives” and whether donor families from as far back as 1995 will be included.
- Risk of Misuse – Fears of out-of-turn allotments or exploitation, especially with ongoing organ racket busts in India.
- Need for Inclusivity – Despite risks, the policy should not be discarded, given its intent to counter patriarchal bias.
Way Forward
-
- Make the policy participatory with inputs from all implementation agencies.
- Ensure compliance with the Transplantation of Human Organs Act.
- Expand organ access without undermining health-based priority for those in greatest need.
Conclusion
While the advisory’s intent is commendable, its success depends on clear definitions, transparent protocols, and safeguarding against misuse. Inclusive consultations with stakeholders can ensure equitable access without compromising health-based prioritisation. If implemented with integrity and accountability, the initiative can widen organ access, protect donor families’ rights, and set a precedent for socially just healthcare policies in India.