Editorial 2: A tectonic shift in thinking to build seismic resilience
The danger of unpreparedness
|
Aspect |
Details |
|
Tectonic Cause |
India’s seismic risk arises from the northward movement of the Indian Plate, colliding with the Eurasian Plate at 4–5 cm per year, forming the Himalayas. |
|
Great Himalayan Earthquake Threat |
The region is overdue for a magnitude 8+ earthquake, which could affect over 300 million peopleacross northern India, Nepal, and Bhutan. |
|
Delhi’s Seismic Risk |
Located in Seismic Zone IV (high risk) with a PGA of 0.24g, Delhi is close to a major tectonic boundary and is home to 33.5 million people and over 5,000 high-rises, many non-compliant with seismic codes. |
|
Code Non-Compliance |
Many structures do not follow the IS 1893:2016 Code (by Bureau of Indian Standards) that requires ductile detailing and shear walls for earthquake resistance. |
|
Historical Earthquakes |
- Bhuj (2001): 7.7 magnitude, 20,000+ deaths |
|
Seismic Zones in India |
Ranges from Zone II to Zone V. Zone V includes the northeast (e.g., Manipur, Nagaland, Mizoram) and Andaman & Nicobar Islands. |
|
Recent Quakes in Zone V Regions |
- Mandalay, Myanmar (Mar 28, 2025): 7.7 magnitude |
|
Tsunami Risk |
Andaman and Nicobar Islands, in Zone V, remain at high tsunami risk due to subduction zone activity, as seen in the 2004 tsunami. |
|
Himalayan Seismic Activity |
Tibetan quake (May 12, 2025): 5.7 magnitude, caused tremors in Sikkim, underscoring Himalayan unrest. |
|
Global Quake Indicators |
Greece (May 22, 2025): 6.2 magnitude quake shows global tectonic instability, though direct impact on India is minimal. |
Global lessons
Conclusion
The Bhuj earthquake stands as a stark reminder of how lack of preparedness can magnify the scale of disaster and loss. It continues to serve as a haunting lesson for India, where frequent tremors highlight the urgent need to build seismic resilience. This is not just a technical necessity but also a moral responsibility to safeguard lives and livelihoods. In light of these ongoing threats, a national dialogue must be initiated to drive proactive action before another major quake occurs. The recent tremor in Delhi reinforces this urgency, calling for a decisive shift from vulnerability to strength through enforcement, awareness, and robust infrastructure.