Editorial 2: ​All in one

Context

Agriculture requires increased public investment, not merely consolidation under a single scheme.

Introduction

The PM Dhan-Dhaanya Krishi Yojana (PMDDKY) is a transformative initiative aimed at revitalising Indian agriculture through convergence of 36 schemes across 11 departments. With a focus on bridging productivity gapsacross districts and promoting self-reliance, the scheme aspires to bring uniformity, efficiency, and localised planningto the sector, while addressing issues of low investment and fragmented implementation.

Overview of PM Dhan-Dhaanya Krishi Yojana (PMDDKY)

• Launched by: Union Cabinet; to be implemented from October (Rabi season).
• Implementation Mode: Convergence of 36 existing schemes across 11 Union Government Departments.
• Budget Allocation: ₹24,000 crore annually for 6 years.
• Objective: Address intra- and inter-State disparities in agricultural productivity.

Integration of Existing Schemes

• Schemes such as PM-KISAN and PM Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY) will be subsumed.
• Relevant State schemes will be integrated based on recommendations by District Dhan Dhaanya Samitis.
• Designed to ensure uniform implementation of welfare, financial, and technical schemes in agriculture.

Focus Areas and Selection Criteria

• Modelled on: NITI Aayog’s Aspirational Districts Programme.
• Targeted Coverage: 100 districts identified based on:
  • Low crop productivity.
  • Low cropping intensity.
  • Poor credit disbursement.

Expected Outcomes

• Enhanced agricultural productivity and value addition in allied sectors.
• Boost to local livelihoods and self-reliance in:
  • Foodgrain production.
  • Edible oil and pulses.
• Promotion of crop diversification, soil health, and water conservation.

Governance and Monitoring

• Monthly monitoring through 117 key indicators.
• Emphasis on District-level planning aligned with national agricultural goals.

Role of Stakeholders

• Involvement of:
  • State Governments.
  • Local Self-Governments.
  • Primary Agricultural Cooperative Societies (PACS).
  • Agricultural universities, farmers’ and traders’ organisations.
• Promotion of private-public partnerships for long-term sustainability.

Concerns and Critical Perspective

• Declining Public Investment:
  • Agriculture allocation as % of Central Plan outlay:
    • 2021–22: 3.53%
    • 2022–23: 3.14%
    • 2023–24: 2.57%
    • 2024–25: 2.54%
    • 2025–26: 2.51%
• Decreasing sowing of oilseeds and pulses noted in latest Kharif season data.
• Need to ensure that uniformity does not overlook local needs and reduce flexibility.

Conclusion

While PMDDKY holds promise for integrated and inclusive agricultural growth, its success hinges on effective coordination, adequate public investment, and active stakeholder participation. Ensuring that national goals align with local realities will be crucial. If implemented earnestly, the scheme can catalyse rural livelihoods, ensure food security, and strengthen India’s journey toward sustainable and self-reliant agriculture.