Editorial 1: Reform cannot wait, aviation safety is at stake
Context
The Ahmedabad air crash should be a wake-up call — it’s time to build a real culture of safety that reaches every partof India’s aviation system.
Introduction
The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) released its preliminary report on the Air India Boeing 787 crash in Ahmedabad (June 12, 2025) on July 12. The report is still inconclusive and leaves key questions unanswered — especially whether the pilot’s actions were accidental or intentional. I believe that many pilots and people like me, who closely follow aviation issues, have little confidence in how these investigations are done. This lack of trust is not just about one report — it reflects a deeper problem in India’s aviation system. Too often, the system punishes pilots and other frontline staff harshly, while airlines and regulators are rarely held equally accountable. This imbalance makes people doubt whether investigations are really fair or reliable, even if the findings may be correct.
Reform Must Be Rooted in a True Safety Culture
Understanding Aviation’s Technical Layers
The aviation system is complex but can be broken down into two main responsibility zones:
|
System Component |
Responsible Entity |
|
Aircraft design, maintenance, airworthiness |
Airline operator |
|
Pilots, cabin crew, engineers, technicians |
Airline operator |
|
Airport infrastructure, ATC systems & personnel |
Airports Authority of India (AAI) / Aerodrome operator |
|
Regulatory oversight of airlines, AAI, airports |
Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) |
|
Supervisory control of DGCA and AAI |
Ministry of Civil Aviation (MoCA) |
Years of working with aviation professionals have helped me understand these technical layers and their interconnections.
Why Accidents Happen: The Swiss Cheese Model
Impact of Court Interventions
Alarming State of Mumbai's Airspace
Regulatory Gaps and Misrepresentation
Obstacle Clearance Around Airports
|
Issue |
Details |
|
Strict control till 2008 |
Until 2008, building heights around airports were regulated under the Aircraft Act and Statutory Order 988 (1988). |
|
Change in 2008 |
A non-statutory committee bypassed these legal safeguards and cleared 25 high-rise buildings in Mumbai using ICAO’s aeronautical study. |
|
ICAO's role misused |
The ICAO study was wrongly used to approve illegal heights. ICAO later distanced itself, but the AAI continued weaker assessments. |
|
Appellate committee's failure |
Post-2015, the appellate committee allowed unsafe height clearances that affected radar and communication. |
|
Statutory recognition in 2015 |
Ironically, this same committee was given legal recognition under the 2015 Rules, even though the rules didn’t allow such relaxations. |
Conflict of Interest: The same authorities that approved safety violations (MoCA, DGCA, AAI) also judge complaints, making the process biased.
Regulatory Gaps and Evading Responsibility
Worsening Trend Nationwide
|
Airport Project |
Safety Risk |
|
Mumbai |
Starting point of obstacle-related violations. |
|
Navi Mumbai |
Set to begin with a displaced threshold, limiting runway usage due to obstacles. |
|
Noida |
High-rises already affecting the safety envelope of a project still under construction. |
These airports are becoming symbols of corruption and neglect, not development.
Six Pillars of Systemic Collapse
1. Aircraft Design & Airworthiness
2. Aircraft Maintenance
3. Flight Crew
4. Airline Operations
5. Air Traffic Management
6. Silencing Whistle-blowers
Crashes Are Not Accidents — They’re Symptoms
|
Crash |
Year |
Cause Linked to Systemic Failure |
|
Ghatkopar |
2018 |
Operating from an illegal hangar |
|
Kozhikode |
2020 |
Runway overshoot, ignored warnings |
|
Ahmedabad |
2025 |
Obstacle and radar interference |
These are not isolated tragedies — they are outcomes of years of neglect, poor regulation, and profit-over-safety thinking.
Final Call for Action
Conclusion
The judiciary, often seen as the guardian of India’s Constitution, has mostly stayed silent on aviation issues, trusting the technical expertise of the state. But now, it must step up and take action. It should address the declining safety in the aviation sector and hold authorities accountable. Also, the judiciary’s outdated approach to valuing human life needs to change. In India, human life is often undervalued—as seen in the small compensations in railway and road accidents, usually just a few lakhs of rupees. When life is treated as cheap, spending crores on safety measures seems unnecessary to decision-makers. There is a need for urgent and complete reform. The aviation sector must be built on transparency, strict oversight, and a clear focus on safety over profit. Reform cannot be delayed. People’s lives are at risk.