Article 2: Acting Chief Justice of a High Court
Why in News: Supreme Court Justice Sandeep Mehta questioned the delay in transferring Rajasthan High Court Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma amid allegations of favouritism, maladministration and judicial impropriety.
Key Details
- Article 223: Provides for an Acting Chief Justice when a High Court Chief Justice’s office is vacant or the CJ is unable to perform duties.
- Appointment: The President appoints a judge of the same High Court as Acting Chief Justice.
- Temporary Role: The Acting CJ performs the duties and functions of the Chief Justice until the regular CJ assumes office or resumes duties.
- Not Necessarily Senior-most: The Constitution does not require the Acting CJ to be the senior-most judge of the High Court.
- Institutional Continuity: The provision prevents an administrative and constitutional vacuum, ensuring uninterrupted judicial functioning.
Constitutional Provision
- Article 223 deals with the appointment of an Acting Chief Justice of a High Court.
- It applies when the office of the Chief Justice is vacant, or when the Chief Justice is unable to perform duties due to absence or any other reason.
- The President of India appoints another judge of the same High Court to perform the duties of the Chief Justice.
When is an Acting Chief Justice Appointed?
- When the post of Chief Justice becomes vacant due to retirement, resignation, death, transfer or appointment to another position.
- When the Chief Justice is temporarily unable to perform duties because of absence or other circumstances.
- The arrangement continues until the Chief Justice resumes duties or a regular Chief Justice is appointed.
Who Can Become Acting Chief Justice?
- The Acting Chief Justice must be a judge of the same High Court.
- The appointment is made by the President of India.
- It is not necessary that the judge appointed as Acting Chief Justice be the senior-most judge of the High Court.
- The provision ensures continuity in the administration and functioning of the High Court.
Powers and Functions
- The Acting Chief Justice performs the duties and functions of the Chief Justice during the period of appointment.
- These include administrative responsibilities associated with the office of the Chief Justice.
- The Acting Chief Justice can exercise the powers available to the Chief Justice subject to constitutional and legal limitations.
- The arrangement prevents disruption in the judicial and administrative functioning of the High Court.
Acting CJ vs Regular Chief Justice
|
Acting Chief Justice
|
Regular Chief Justice
|
|
Appointed under Article 223
|
Appointed as the permanent Chief Justice of the High Court
|
|
Temporary arrangement
|
Regular appointment
|
|
Appointed when CJ's office is vacant or CJ cannot perform duties
|
Appointed to fill the office normally
|
|
Must be a judge of the same High Court
|
May be appointed from another High Court
|
|
Performs CJ's duties temporarily
|
Holds the office as Chief Justice
|
Importance
- Ensures continuity of judicial administration during a vacancy or temporary absence.
- Prevents a constitutional or administrative vacuum in the High Court.
- Ensures that important administrative and judicial functions continue without interruption.
- Reflects the constitutional principle of maintaining institutional continuity in the judiciary.
Conclusion
- Article 223 provides a temporary constitutional mechanism to ensure that a High Court continues to function effectively when its Chief Justice is unavailable.
- The Acting Chief Justice performs the duties of the office, but the arrangement does not amount to a permanent appointment as Chief Justice.